Is 'first in family' a good indicator for widening university participation? / Anna Adamecz-Völgyi (University College London and KRTK), Morag Henderson (University College London), Nikki Shure (University College London and IZA) ; IZA Institute of Labor Economics
VerfasserAdamecz-Völgyi, Anna ; Henderson, Morag ; Shure, Nikki
KörperschaftForschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit
ErschienenBonn, Germany : IZA Institute of Labor Economics, December 2019
Elektronische Ressource
Umfang1 Online-Ressource (42 Seiten) : Diagramme
SerieDiscussion paper ; no. 12826
 Das Dokument ist öffentlich zugänglich im Rahmen des deutschen Urheberrechts.
Is 'first in family' a good indicator for widening university participation? [0.92 mb]
Verfügbarkeit In meiner Bibliothek

Universities use 'first in family' or 'first generation' as an indicator to increase the diversity of their student intake, but little is known about whether it is a good indicator of disadvantage. We use nationally representative, longitudinal survey data linked to administrative data from England to provide the first comprehensive analysis of this measure. We employ parametric probability (logit) and non-parametric classification (random forest) models to look at its relative predictive power of university participation and graduation. We find that being first in family is an important barrier to university participation and graduation, over and above other sources of disadvantage. This association seems to operate through the channel of early educational attainment. Our findings indicate that the first in family indicator could be key in efforts to widen participation at universities.