Titelaufnahme

Titel
Until taxes do us part: tax penalties or bonuses and the marriage decision / Francesca Barigozzi (University of Bologna), Helmuth Cremer (Toulouse School of Economics and IZA), Kerstin Roeder (University of Augsburg) ; IZA Institute of Labor Economics
VerfasserBarigozzi, Francesca In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen ; Cremer, Helmuth In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen ; Roeder, Kerstin In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
KörperschaftForschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
ErschienenBonn, Germany : IZA Institute of Labor Economics, October 2017
Ausgabe
Elektronische Ressource
Umfang1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten) : Diagramme
SerieDiscussion paper ; no. 11119
URNurn:nbn:de:hbz:5:2-142525 Persistent Identifier (URN)
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar.
Volltexte
Until taxes do us part: tax penalties or bonuses and the marriage decision [0.32 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Verfügbarkeit In meiner Bibliothek
Zusammenfassung

The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. We study how they affect the decision to get married by considering two potential spouses who play a marriage proposal game. At the end of the game they may get married, live together without formal marriage, or split up. In this signaling game, proposing (or getting married) is costly but can indicate strong love. The striking property we obtain is that a marriage bonus may actually reduce the probability that a couple gets married. If the bonus is sufficiently large, the signaling mechanism breaks down, and only a pooling equilibrium in which fewer couples get married remains. Similarly, a marriage penalty may increase the marriage probability. Specifically, the penalty may lead to a separating equilibrium with efficiency enhancing information transmission, which was otherwise not possible. Our results also imply that marriage decisions in the laissez-faire are not necessarily privately optimal. In some cases a bonus or a penalty may effectively make the marriage decision more efficient; it may increase the number of efficient marriages that otherwise may not be concluded.