Titelaufnahme

Titel
Do higher achievers cheat less? : an experiment of self-revealing individual cheating / Erez Siniver (COMAS), Yossef Tobol (Jerusalem College of Technology and IZA), Gideon Yaniv (Ariel University) ; IZA, Institute of Labor Economics
VerfasserSiniver, Erez In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Erez Siniver ; Tobol, Yossef In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Yossef Tobol ; Yaniv, Gideon In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Gideon Yaniv
KörperschaftForschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit
ErschienenBonn, Germany : IZA Institute of Labor Economics, April 2017
Ausgabe
Elektronische Ressource
Umfang1 Online-Ressource (18 Seiten) : Diagramme
SerieDiscussion paper ; no. 10709
URNurn:nbn:de:hbz:5:2-121911 Persistent Identifier (URN)
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar.
Volltexte
Do higher achievers cheat less? [0.84 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Verfügbarkeit In meiner Bibliothek
Zusammenfassung

The extensive body of survey-based research correlating between students cheating and their academic grade point average (GPA) consistently finds a significant negative relationship between cheating and the GPA. The present paper reports the results of a tworound experiment designed to expose student cheating at the individual level and correlate it with three intellectual achievement measures: the GPA, the high-school matriculation average grade (MAG) and the psychometric exam score (PES). The experiment involved two classes of third-year economics students incentivized by a competitive reward to answer a multiple-choice trivia quiz without consulting their electronic devices. While this forbiddance was deliberately overlooked in the first round, providing an opportunity to cheat, it was strictly enforced in the second, conducted two months later in the same classes with the same quiz. A comparison of subjects performance in the two rounds, self-revealed a considerable extent of cheating in the first one. Regressing the individual cheating levels on subjects gender and their intellectual achievement measures exhibited no significant differences in cheating between males and females. However, cheating of both genders was found to significantly increase with each achievement measure, implying, in sharp contrast with the direct-question surveys, that higher achievers are bigger cheaters.