Titelaufnahme

Titel
Competitive preferences and ethnicity : experimental evidence from Bangladesh / Abu Siddique (University of Southampton), Michael Vlassopoulos (University of Southampton and IZA) ; IZA, Institute of Labor Economics
VerfasserSiddique, Abu In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Abu Siddique ; Vlassopoulos, Michael In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Michael Vlassopoulos
KörperschaftForschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen In Wikipedia suchen nach Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit
ErschienenBonn, Germany : IZA Institute of Labor Economics, March 2017
Ausgabe
Elektronische Ressource
Umfang1 Online-Ressource (32, A4, B9 Seiten) : Diagramme
SerieDiscussion paper ; no. 10682
URNurn:nbn:de:hbz:5:2-121185 Persistent Identifier (URN)
Zugriffsbeschränkung
 Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar.
Volltexte
Competitive preferences and ethnicity [1.12 mb]
Links
Nachweis
Verfügbarkeit In meiner Bibliothek
Zusammenfassung

In many countries, ethnic minorities have a persistent disadvantageous socioeconomic position. We investigate whether aversion to competing against members of the ethnically dominant group could be a contributing factor to this predicament. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Bangladesh recruiting males from the ethnic majority (Bengali) and an underprivileged ethnic minority group (Santal) that is severely discriminated against. We randomly assign participants into groups with different ethnic composition and elicit a measure of their competitiveness. We find that when compelled to compete, there are no ethnic differences in performance and that both ethnic groups perform better in ethnically-mixed groups than in homogeneous groups. We also find that the ethnic composition of the group of competitors is an important determinant of competitive entry and its effect varies by ethnic group. Members of the ethnic minority group are less likely to compete in groups where they are a numerical minority than when all competitors are co-ethnic, whereas the reverse is true for members of the ethnic majority group. This difference is not explained by heterogeneity in performance, risk preferences, beliefs about relative ability or various socioeconomic characteristics; instead, observed behavior seems to be driven by ethnic differences in preference for interethnic competition.